This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
openbsd:irc:zncbad [2020/07/29 01:40] jrmu |
openbsd:irc:zncbad [2020/07/30 01:44] (current) jrmu |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | ====== ZNC Bad ====== | + | ====== Why ZNC is destined for failure ====== |
| - ZNC requires one connection per network. If a user wants to connect to 10 networks at once (freenode, ircnow, dal, efnet, etc), it requires him to set up 10 independent connections on his IRC client. This is almost impossible with mobile apps and very confusing for GUI apps. Practical experience has shown that <30% of bouncer users know how to do this. If you rely on ZNC, you will lose >70% of potential users. ZNC developers have declared they have zero interest in fixing this design flaw; in fact, they are proud of it. | - ZNC requires one connection per network. If a user wants to connect to 10 networks at once (freenode, ircnow, dal, efnet, etc), it requires him to set up 10 independent connections on his IRC client. This is almost impossible with mobile apps and very confusing for GUI apps. Practical experience has shown that <30% of bouncer users know how to do this. If you rely on ZNC, you will lose >70% of potential users. ZNC developers have declared they have zero interest in fixing this design flaw; in fact, they are proud of it. | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| ZNC is only 50% of the way there to a good bouncer. We chose it because it is more polished than psyBNC currently. psyBNC is only 30% of the way to a good bouncer. However, the problem is that znc is going on the wrong path, and will never straighten its course because of the above mentioned design flaws and a stubborn development team. psyBNC, however, is abandonware so we can mold it to fit our own goals. | ZNC is only 50% of the way there to a good bouncer. We chose it because it is more polished than psyBNC currently. psyBNC is only 30% of the way to a good bouncer. However, the problem is that znc is going on the wrong path, and will never straighten its course because of the above mentioned design flaws and a stubborn development team. psyBNC, however, is abandonware so we can mold it to fit our own goals. | ||
| - | ====== psyBNC Good ====== | + | ====== psyBNC is the bouncer of the future ====== |
| - Written in C, a UNIX hacker's best friend. | - Written in C, a UNIX hacker's best friend. | ||
| - psyBNC can multiplex multiple network connections onto a single connection, so that users only have to connect to psyBNC once to access all networks. If a user chooses to connect to 200 networks using psyBNC, his IRC client only has to connect once to psyBNC. This is a lot more intuitive than logging in 200 times. | - psyBNC can multiplex multiple network connections onto a single connection, so that users only have to connect to psyBNC once to access all networks. If a user chooses to connect to 200 networks using psyBNC, his IRC client only has to connect once to psyBNC. This is a lot more intuitive than logging in 200 times. | ||
| - Instead of chroot, we can use OpenBSD's pledge and unveil for greater security. | - Instead of chroot, we can use OpenBSD's pledge and unveil for greater security. | ||